새 탭에서 열립니다
혁신적인 공기질 솔루션

업계 인사이트

최신 게시물

현대식 거실에 IoT 및 AI 기능을 갖춘 스마트 공기청정기

IoT와 AI가 공기청정기 기능을 어떻게 혁신할 수 있을까요?

공기 정화 환경은 중대한 변화를 앞두고 있습니다. IoT와 AI 기술을 통합함으로써 공기청정기는 더욱 스마트해지고 있으며, 실시간으로 ...
2024-11-13
뉴스

공기청정기 생산을 주도하는 국가는 어디일까요? 중국과 인도?

전 세계적으로 공기질 문제에 대한 인식이 높아지면서 공기청정기에 대한 수요가 급증하고 있습니다. 이 기사에서는 중국 간의 경쟁 구도를 살펴봅니다 ...
2024-11-13
뉴스
공장 환경의 생산 라인에 있는 공기 청정기

공기청정기 생산을 주도하는 국가는 어디일까요? 말레이시아 또는 중국?

공기질에 대한 우려가 높아지면서 공기청정기에 대한 수요도 증가하고 있습니다. 이 기사에서는 이러한 장치의 기원이 중요한지 여부에 초점을 맞춰 살펴봅니다.
2024-11-13
뉴스
공기청정기와 소음 측정기를 갖춘 전문 테스트 룸

공기청정기의 소음 수준을 효과적으로 테스트하려면 어떻게 해야 하나요?

저와 같은 분이라면 휴식과 생산성을 위해 평화로운 환경이 필수적입니다. 공기청정기에 투자할 때 걱정했던 것은 ...
2024-11-13
뉴스
공장을 배경으로 한 중국과 멕시코의 공기청정기 생산량 비교

공기청정기 생산을 주도하는 국가는 어디일까요? 중국 또는 멕시코?

전 세계적으로 공기질에 대한 우려가 높아지면서 공기청정기의 생산이 화제가 되고 있습니다. 중국은 현재 70% 이상의 점유율로 이 시장을 지배하고 있습니다 ...
2024-11-13
뉴스
공장에서 HEPA 필터 생산 라인을 검사하는 기술자

최고의 HEPA 필터 제조업체를 선택할 때 고려해야 할 요소는 무엇인가요?

최적의 공기질을 유지하려면 올바른 HEPA 필터 제조업체를 선택하는 것이 필수적입니다. 단순히 이름을 고르는 것이 아니라 주요 요소를 이해하는 것이 중요합니다 ...
2024-11-12
뉴스
HEPA 필터 제조 공정의 상세 보기

OEM을 위한 HEPA 필터 제조가 필수적인 이유는 무엇인가요?

공기 질이 가장 중요한 환경에서 HEPA 필터는 공기 중 오염 물질을 차단하는 중요한 장벽 역할을 합니다. 특히 헬스케어와 같은 분야의 OEM의 경우 ...
2024-11-12
뉴스
현대 거실의 공기 청정기

공기청정기가 먼지, 곰팡이를 효과적으로 제거하고 알레르기를 완화하나요?

알레르기 계절이 점점 더 심해지면서 많은 사람들이 공기청정기가 실내 공기질 문제를 진정으로 해결할 수 있는지 궁금해합니다. 이 블로그에서는 ...
2024-11-12
공기 청정기
국제 무역과 관세를 상징하는 크레인이 가동 중인 분주한 항구의 컨테이너.

관세 인상이 중국에서 미국으로 공기청정기를 수입하는 비용에 어떤 영향을 미치나요?

Navigating the turbulent waters of international trade requires keen awareness of tariff changes, especially when importing essential goods like air purifiers. As tariffs rise, costs ...
2024-11-12
뉴스
무역 박람회에 전시된 다양한 공기청정기

미국에서 신뢰할 수 있는 공기청정기 제조업체는 어디에서 찾을 수 있나요?

As concerns about air quality rise, finding a trusted air purifier manufacturer in the USA becomes crucial. The market features a few key players like ...
2024-11-12
뉴스
학생과 의료진이 있는 학교 병원 환경의 공기 청정기

학교와 병원에서 공기청정기의 유지보수 비용을 효과적으로 절감하려면 어떻게 해야 할까요?

As a facility manager, I understand the challenges of keeping maintenance costs down while ensuring optimal air quality in schools and hospitals. In this article, ...
2024-11-11
뉴스
디지털 태블릿으로 공기청정기 시장 전략을 분석하는 사업가

성공적인 공기청정기 비즈니스를 시작하기 위한 단계는 무엇인가요?

Entering the air purifier market can be a rewarding venture, especially with the growing awareness of health issues linked to air quality. In this guide, ...
2024-11-08
뉴스
Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기