새 탭에서 열립니다
혁신적인 공기질 솔루션

20년 경력의 전문 OEM 공기청정기 제조업체

비즈니스를 위한 OEM 공기청정기를 제조 및 공급하는 서비스를 찾고 계신가요? 20년 이상의 경험을 바탕으로 Hisoair는 전 세계 브랜드 및 계약업체에 OEM 공기청정기를 공급해 왔습니다. 고객이 선택한 가격 및 품질 요구 사항에 따라 맞춤형 OEM 공기청정기를 설계, 제작 및 공급할 수 있도록 도와드립니다.
견적 요청하기

50개 이상의 공기청정기 프로젝트

포춘 500대 기업을 위한 공기 정화 프로젝트 개발
로고

기술

데시벨 캔슬레이션™ 기술

소음은 항상 상업용 공기청정기의 큰 문제였으며, 히소에어는 상업용 공기청정기 분야에 깊이 관여해 왔습니다. 공기청정기의 소음을 줄이기 위해 히소에어 R&D 팀은 모터, 팬, 소재, 구조 및 프레임에 대한 수백 가지의 종합적인 테스트를 수행한 끝에 마침내 데시벨 캔슬레이션™ 기술을 개발했습니다. 이제 시중에 나와 있는 공기청정기 중 저희 제품만큼 조용한 제품은 없다고 자부할 수 있습니다!

데시벨 캔슬레이션™ 기술에 대해 알아보기

팬
전방 기울기형 원심 송풍기

공기 정화 시스템

Thread 및 LoRaWAN 기술이 적용된 궁극의 IoT 풀서비스 솔루션은 단순한 제품을 뛰어넘습니다. 미래의 가능성을 열어주는 솔루션으로, 모든 요구사항에 맞는 맞춤형 연결과 향상된 성능을 보장합니다. 탁월한 통합과 효율성을 경험하고 비즈니스를 발전시켜 보세요.

고급 필터링 기술

초저 차압(D/P) 기술로 효율성 저하 없이 우수한 공기 흐름을 보장합니다. 멜트블로운 코어는 0.3μm의 작은 입자까지 포집할 수 있도록 복잡하게 짜여져 있어 탁월한 여과 성능을 제공합니다.

필터 유형 효율성 D/P(기타) D/P(HISO)
H11 95% 15 Pa 8Pa / 11Pa
H12 99.50% 25 Pa 13Pa / 18Pa
H13 99.97% 30 Pa 22Pa / 25Pa
H14 99.99% 45 Pa 30Pa / 35Pa
   표준  EN 143, NaCl, 0.3um, @5.33 cm/s
문의하기

고품질 공기청정기 제공

귀하의 문의는 매우 중요합니다. 곧 연결해 드리며, 회원님의 정보는 항상 안전하게 보호됩니다.
견적 요청하기

OEM 및 ODM 흐름도

OEM ODM 흐름도 2

인증서

전 세계적으로 인정받은 품질 인증
EN1822 표준 인증
ISO 16890 공기 필터 테스트 및 분류 인증 로고
ISO 9001 인증 품질 경영 시스템 표준
UL 인증 로고
공중 보건 인증 위원회(PHAB) 로고
etl
CE 로고
로 로고
SGS ISO 9001
FCC 로고
로고
Ashare 로고 - 전문 공기질 솔루션 제공업체

갤러리

첨단 R&D 및 제조 우수성

고객 후기

글로벌 전문가들이 신뢰하는 기업
" 구글에서 Hisoair의 웹사이트를 찾았는데 솔직히 처음에는 신뢰할 수 있을지 확신이 없었지만 한 달 반 만에 제 프로젝트 요구 사항을 완료해 주었어요. 그리고 프로젝트에 CO2 센서를 긴급하게 추가해야 했을 때 일주일 만에 새 샘플을 완성해 주었기 때문에 제가 지금까지 함께 일했던 업체 중 가장 전문적이고 고객 중심적인 업체였습니다."
tms 1
Thomas
독일 정부 공급업체
" 우리 모두는 COVID가 전 세계, 특히 인도에 끔찍한 재앙이라는 것을 알고 있습니다. 저는 HisoAir에서 공기 청정기를 구입했습니다. 이것은 저와 제 사무실, 집, 가족 및 친구들에게 매우 유용했습니다. 저는 지난 7 년 동안 HisoAir 출신 인 Alwen과 함께 일해 왔으며 그가 매우 신뢰할 수있는 사람이고 매우 효율적이며 매우 전문적이라는 것을 알 수 있습니다."
고객 후기 2
란지트 발라
인도에서 의료 제품 수입업체
" 우리는 15년 이상 민간 기관 및 민간 부문과 협력한 경험이 있는 회사로, 히소와 3년 동안 협력해 왔으며 히소가 우리에게 제공한 작업에 대해 정말 감사하게 생각합니다. 히소와의 협업에 감사드립니다. 체리와 이씨 "
고객 후기
헤리나
루마니아의 병원 및 정부 공급업체

견적 요청하기

아래에 메시지를 남겨주세요.

최대한 빨리 연락드리겠습니다!

계속 연락하기

연락처 정보

귀하의 질문은 저희에게 중요합니다.
곧 연결해드리겠으며, 회원님의 정보는 항상 안전하게 보호됩니다.
sales@hisoair.com
+86 138 0961 9940

미국 오피스주소: 2180 S 와인빌 애비 온타리오, CA 91761

Office: 광둥성 둥관시 송산호수공원 2호로 4호 빌딩 1, 712~713호, 523429.

공장 중국 | 베트남 | 태국 | 말레이시아

Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기