새 탭에서 열립니다
혁신적인 공기질 솔루션

Global Patented SteamPure™ Tech

99.99% Sterilization Boiling
SteamPure™ uses a micro-boil chamber (≈50 ml) to reachstable output in about 10 minutes. Each drop is boiled before release to reduce bacteria and mineral carryover creating a soft, visible mist that feels naturally comfortable.
지금 문의
10 min
to steady mist
Hygienic
boil-first output
Low noise
smart airflow
stainless humidifier 15

What We Offer

hm300

Why SteamPure™ Technology?

Fast
small-volume rapid boil achieves targethumidity quickly.
Comfortable
soft, visible mist disperses smoothlywith no damp desktops.
Clean
steam purification reduces bacteria anddissolved solids before diffusion.

How lt Works？

Micro-boil
~50 ml of water is heated to a rollingboil.
Purify & Calm
steam passes through a calmingpath to form gentle, visible mist.
Smart Diffusion
integrated airflow delivers 360°coverage without hot spots.
hm300 2

주요 기능

Rapid Heating
Just 10 Minutes With only 50 ml of water per cycle, SteamPure™ reaches boiling in 10 minutes, providing fast and efficient humidification.
Gentle, Visible Mist
SteamPure™ produces a soft, natural mist — lighter and cleaner than ultrasonic fog, blending smoothly into the room atmosphere for a comfortable humidity level.
Hygienic Steam Output
Every drop of water is boiled before release, helping reduce bacteria and impurities for healthier indoor air.
Smart Diffusion Design
An integrated fan disperses steam evenly, preventing hot spots and ensuring safe, comfortable use in any environment.
Energy-Saving Performance
Designed for efficiency, SteamPure™ uses minimal water and power while maximizing humidification output.
Quiet by Design
Low-turbulence airflow and damping keep nighttime noise down.
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기