새 탭에서 열립니다
Air & Water Purification OEM/ODM Manufacturer | HisoAir

반려동물 공기청정기(HA-360)

고효율 FurTrap™ 기술이 적용된 반려동물용 공기청정기

반려동물 친화적인 가정을 위해 설계된 FurTrap™ 기술을 만나보세요. 전면과 측면에 공기 흡입구가 있어 길고 짧은 반려동물의 털을 손쉽게 포집할 수 있습니다.

5.8mm에서 11mm의 구멍으로 막힘 없이 효율적으로 포집하여 집안을 깨끗하고 쾌적하게 유지합니다. 고급 공기청정기로 털 없는 환경과 우수한 공기질을 즐기세요.

즉시 견적 받기

99.99% 효율로 편안한 숨쉬기

반려동물의 털, 비듬, 알레르기 유발 물질을 99.99% 포집하는 고급 FurTrap™ 기술을 통해 알레르기 없는 집안을 경험하세요. 이중층 여과 시스템은 다양한 오염 물질을 대상으로 합니다. 레이어 A(활성탄 프리필터)는 바이러스, 털, 비듬, 섬유 및 먼지를 걸러냅니다.

레이어 B(HEPA 필터)는 냄새, 박테리아, 알레르기 유발 물질 및 연기를 제거합니다. 반려동물과 알레르기가 있는 사람에게 적합한 최첨단 공기청정기로 더 깨끗한 공기와 건강한 환경을 즐겨보세요.

즉시 견적 받기
데시벨 캔슬레이션™ 기술

사용자와 반려동물을 위한 조용한 안락함

데시벨 캔슬링 기술을 통해 사용자와 반려동물에게 평화로운 환경을 조성하세요. 터보 모드에서 최대 49dB의 소음 레벨로 차분한 분위기를 보장합니다. 수면 모드로 전환하면 26dB의 초저소음으로 편안한 밤을 보낼 수 있습니다.

고급 공기청정기로 소음 없이 우수한 공기질을 즐기며 집안을 평온하고 편안한 안식처로 만들어 보세요. 평화와 깨끗한 공기를 모두 원하는 반려동물 주인에게 이상적입니다.

즉시 견적 받기

반려동물 친화적이고 안전한 서비스

안정적인 스탠딩 디자인으로 반려동물이 있는 바쁜 가정에서도 공기청정기를 똑바로 세울 수 있습니다. 45도 각도로 기울어지는 구조로 쉽게 기울어지지 않아 공기질을 유지하는 데 안전하고 안정적인 솔루션을 제공합니다.

정수기가 제자리에 있어 중단 없이 지속적인 성능을 제공하므로 안심하고 사용할 수 있습니다. 집안 환경의 안전과 효율성을 모두 원하는 반려동물 보호자에게 적합합니다.

즉시 견적 받기

안전한 공기, 안전한 집: 사랑하는 가족을 보호하세요

아이와 반려동물의 안전을 위해 차일드락이 장착된 공기청정기로 안전하고 건강한 가정을 지켜주세요.

자녀 잠금 기능은 실수로 설정을 변경하는 것을 방지하고 가족을 보호합니다. 자녀 잠금 기능은 실수로 설정을 변경하는 것을 방지합니다.

즉시 견적 받기

견적 요청하기

아래에 메시지를 남겨주세요.

최대한 빨리 연락드리겠습니다!

계속 연락하기

연락처 정보

귀하의 질문은 저희에게 중요합니다.
곧 연결해드리겠으며, 회원님의 정보는 항상 안전하게 보호됩니다.
sales@hisoair.com
+86 138 0961 9940

미국 오피스주소: 2180 S 와인빌 애비 온타리오, CA 91761

Office: 광둥성 둥관시 송산호수공원 2호로 4호 빌딩 1, 712~713호, 523429.

공장 중국 | 베트남 | 태국 | 말레이시아

Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기