新しいタブで開きます
革新的な空気品質ソリューション

ペット用空気清浄機(HA-360)

高効率ファートラップ™テクノロジー搭載ペット用空気清浄機

ペットと暮らせる家のために設計されたFurTrap™テクノロジーをご覧ください。フロントとサイドの吸気口で、ペットの長い毛も短い毛も簡単にキャッチします。

5.8mmから11mmまでの開口部が、目詰まりすることなく効率的に捕集し、お部屋を清潔でフレッシュに保ちます。先進の空気清浄機で、髪の毛のない環境と優れた空気品質をお楽しみください。

お見積もり

99.99%の効率で呼吸を楽に

ペットの毛、ふけ、アレルゲンを99.99%捕獲し、アレルギーのない住まいを実現します。当社の二重層ろ過システムは、さまざまな汚染物質をターゲットにしています。A層(活性炭プレフィルター)は、ウイルス、毛皮、ふけ、繊維、ほこりを捕集します。

レイヤーB(HEPAフィルター)がニオイ、バクテリア、アレルゲン、煙を除去します。ペットを飼われている方やアレルギーをお持ちの方に最適です。

お見積もり
デシベル・キャンセリング™テクノロジー

あなたとペットのための静かな快適さ

デシベルキャンセリング技術で、あなたとペットに安らぎの環境を。ターボモードの最大騒音レベルは49dBで、落ち着いた雰囲気をお約束します。スリープモードに切り替えると26dBの超静音になり、安眠に最適です。

騒音に悩まされることなく、優れた空気品質をお楽しみください。当社の高度な空気清浄機で、ご自宅を静寂と快適さの聖域にしましょう。安らぎときれいな空気の両方を求めるペットオーナーに最適です。

お見積もり

ペットに優しく安全

安定したスタンド式デザインで、ペットのいる忙しい家庭でも、空気清浄機は直立した状態を保ちます。45度の角度で簡単に転倒しない構造で、空気の質を維持するための安全で信頼性の高いソリューションを提供します。

清浄機を設置したまま、中断することなく継続的に性能を発揮するので安心です。家庭環境の安全性と効率性の両方を求めるペットオーナーに最適です。

お見積もり

安全な空気、安全な家:大切な人を守る

お子様やペットの安全を守るチャイルドロック付きの空気清浄機で、安全で健康的な家庭を実現しましょう。

チャイルドロックは、不用意な設定変更を防ぎ、家族を守ります。チャイルドロックは、不用意な設定の変更を防ぎます。

お見積もり

見積依頼

メッセージをどうぞ

早急にお返事いたします!

連絡を取り合う

連絡先

あなたの問い合わせは私たちにとって重要です。
私たちはすぐに接続し、あなたの詳細は常に安全です。
sales@hisoair.com
+86 138 0961 9940

米国事務所住所:2180 S ワインビル・アベニュー オンタリオ州91761

オフィス:523429 広東省東莞市松山湖公園二路4号1棟712~713室。

工場中国|ベトナム|タイ|マレーシア

Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

見積依頼