새 탭에서 열립니다
혁신적인 공기질 솔루션

공기청정기 제조업체

전 세계 7대 공기청정기 제조업체

전 세계 7대 공기청정기 제조업체

2021년 현재 세계 공기청정기 시장의 가치는 약 126억 달러로 2022년부터는 기하급수적으로 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다. ...
2022-05-19
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
고려해야 할 상위 6가지 HEPA 필터 제조업체

고려해야 할 상위 6가지 HEPA 필터 제조업체

최고의 공기청정기 제조업체는 대부분 제품 설계에 HEPA 필터를 사용하여 보다 철저한 입자 제거율을 자랑합니다. 자세한 내용은 ...
2022-05-19
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
두바이 최고의 공기청정기 공급업체 5곳

두바이 최고의 공기청정기 공급업체 5곳

고도로 도시화된 장소는 대기 오염이 심해 질병과 건강 문제를 일으킬 수 있습니다. 우수한 공기 청정기로 청소하면 도움이 될 수 있습니다 ...
2022-05-19
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
파키스탄의 상위 5개 에어 필터 제조업체

파키스탄의 상위 5개 에어 필터 제조업체

대기 오염은 건강을 해칠 수 있으며, 고품질 공기 청정기와 필터를 사용하면 눈에 보이지 않는 입자를 대기에서 모두 제거할 수 있습니다. 자세히 알아보기 ...
2022-05-19
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
독일 최고의 에어 필터 회사 6곳

독일 최고의 에어 필터 회사 6곳

공기에서 먼지와 기타 입자를 제거해야 질병을 예방할 수 있습니다. 공기청정기에 사용하거나 직접 설치하는 공기 필터는 ...
2022-05-19
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
일본 5대 공기청정기 제조업체

일본 5대 공기청정기 제조업체

미립자 오염 물질의 공기를 정화하면 화학 물질, 바이러스, 박테리아 등으로 인한 질병 및 질환의 위험을 줄일 수 있습니다. 우리는 나열했습니다 ...
2022-05-18
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
싱가포르의 상위 5개 공기청정기 공급업체

싱가포르의 상위 5개 공기청정기 공급업체

양질의 공기 청정기로 집이나 다른 공간의 공기를 정화하면 대기 오염으로 인한 질병과 질병을 예방하고 ...
2022-05-18
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
국내 최고의 공기청정기 제조사 5곳

국내 최고의 공기청정기 제조사 5곳

공기 오염은 질병과 심지어 사망을 유발할 수 있으며, 양질의 공기 청정기로 공기 오염을 제거하면 이러한 사례를 예방하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다. 최고의 한국산 공기청정기에 대해 알아보세요.
2022-05-18
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
캐나다 최고의 공기청정기 제조사 4곳

캐나다 최고의 공기청정기 제조사 4곳

공기청정기는 사람들이 숨을 들이쉬고 내쉬는 것을 정화한다는 이유만으로 인기가 있습니다. 그들은 의심할 여지없이 다음과 같은 잠재적인 건강 문제를 해결합니다.
2022-05-18
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
인도의 상위 5개 공기청정기 제조업체

인도의 상위 5개 공기청정기 제조업체

세계의 공기 질은 시시각각 악화되고 있으며 공기 청정기와 같은 제품은 사람들이 오염 물질로 인한 질병을 예방하는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다 ...
2022-05-18
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
HisoAir 1601

중국 4대 공기청정기 제조업체

고품질의 공기 청정기를 대량으로 확보해야하는 경우이를 생산하는 다양한 최고의 회사와 연결하는 것이 가장 좋습니다 ...
2022-05-18
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
침실의 공기 청정기

Top 12 World-Class Air Purifier Brands (2026) HEPA

회사나 가정에 적합한 공기청정기 브랜드를 선택하는 데 어려움을 겪고 계신가요? 최고의 HEPA 공기청정기에 대한 솔직한 리뷰를 확인하세요.
2021-04-05
공기청정기 제조업체, 뉴스
Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기