새 탭에서 열립니다
혁신적인 공기질 솔루션

뉴스

대형 창문과 공기청정기를 갖춘 현대적인 상업용 사무실

대형 상업 공간에서 천장형 공기청정기는 얼마나 효과적일까요?

천장형 공기청정기는 대형 상업 공간에서 매우 효과적이며 실내 공기질을 크게 개선합니다. 높은 청정 공기 전달률과 같은 기능이 필요합니다 ...
2024-11-27
뉴스
회의실에 모인 다양한 비즈니스 임원 그룹

중국 수입품에 대한 관세 인상의 영향을 완화하기 위한 효과적인 전략은 무엇인가요?

중국산 수입품에 대한 관세가 인상됨에 따라 기업은 공급망을 다각화하여 적응해야 합니다. 전략에는 베트남과 멕시코와 같은 국가에서 제조 옵션을 모색하는 것이 포함됩니다.
2024-11-26
뉴스
현대식 공장에서 다양한 작업자들이 첨단 제품을 조립하는 모습

중국에서 미국으로 생산을 이전하는 데 있어 주요 단계와 과제는 무엇인가요?

중국에서 미국으로 생산을 이전하는 데에는 수많은 도전과 기회가 있습니다. 주요 단계에는 새로운 공급망 구축, 지적 재산 보호, 협업 등이 포함됩니다.
2024-11-26
뉴스
깨끗하고 현대적인 시설에서 공기청정기를 조립하는 작업자

미국에서 공기청정기 제조를 위한 최고의 모범 사례는 무엇인가요?

미국에서 공기청정기를 제조하려면 필수 부품 수입, HisoAir와 같은 숙련된 파트너와의 협업, 혁신적인 기술 활용과 같은 전략적 관행이 필요합니다. 이 ...
2024-11-26
뉴스
공조 시스템에서 공기 필터를 교체하는 사람

HVAC 시스템의 공기 필터를 교체하는 단계는 무엇인가요?

HVAC 시스템의 공기 필터를 교체하는 것은 깨끗한 실내 공기질을 유지하고 효율적인 작동을 보장하는 데 매우 중요합니다. 이 가이드에서는 간단한 교체 단계를 설명합니다.
2024-11-26
뉴스
에어컨 장치 옆에 있는 HEPA 필터 클로즈업

HEPA 필터를 에어컨에 효과적으로 사용할 수 있나요?

99.97%의 입자를 포집하는 능력으로 알려진 HEPA 필터는 공기 흐름 저항이 높기 때문에 표준 에어컨에는 적합하지 않습니다 ...
2024-11-26
뉴스
호텔 로비, 병실, 학교 교실 등 서로 다른 환경에 있는 세 가지 공기청정기.

호텔, 병원, 학교를 위한 공기청정기를 어떻게 맞춤화할 수 있나요?

공기 청정기는 소음 수준, 공기 교환율 및 여과 시스템과 같은 기능을 사용자 지정하여 호텔, 병원 및 학교에 맞게 맞춤화할 수 있습니다. 호텔은 조용해야 합니다 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
벽걸이형 공기청정기=2

공기청정기에 UV-C, HEPA 및 활성탄 기술을 어떻게 통합할 수 있나요?

이 문서에서는 최적의 실내 공기질을 위해 공기청정기에 HEPA 필터, 활성탄 및 UV-C 기술을 효과적으로 통합하는 방법을 살펴봅니다. HEPA 필터 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
공기청정기와 제습기가 있는 현대적인 거실

공기청정기와 제습기의 주요 차이점은 무엇이며 어떤 것을 선택해야 하나요?

이 글에서는 공기청정기와 제습기의 주요 차이점을 살펴보고 기능, 장점 및 이상적인 사용 시나리오에 대해 자세히 설명합니다. 공기청정기는 실내 공기질을 개선합니다 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
벽걸이형 공기청정기 1

벽걸이형 공기청정기와 데스크탑 공기청정기: 어떤 것을 선택해야 할까요?

벽걸이형과 탁상형 공기청정기를 선택하는 것은 쉽지 않을 수 있습니다. 데스크톱 모델은 휴대가 간편하고 저렴하며 가정용으로 이상적이지만 벽걸이형 장치는 공간을 절약할 수 있습니다 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
다이슨 공기청정기 (3)

다이슨 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

이 문서에서는 중국과 멕시코의 시설과 함께 말레이시아에서 주로 생산되는 다이슨 공기청정기의 제조 원산지를 살펴봅니다. 이 글에서는 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
alen air purifier1 (2)

알렌 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

알렌 공기청정기는 중국 동관 및 산둥성에 위치한 현대식 시설에서 생산됩니다. 이 공장은 첨단 기술과 엄격한 품질 검사를 활용합니다 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기