새 탭에서 열립니다
혁신적인 공기질 솔루션

뉴스

나란히 놓인 HEPA 필터와 카본 필터 클로즈업

공기청정기 필터의 수명을 연장하려면 어떻게 해야 하나요?

공기청정기 필터의 수명을 연장하려면 정기적으로 필터를 관리해야 합니다. 프리 필터의 먼지를 진공청소기로 청소하면 필터의 수명을 크게 늘릴 수 있습니다. 선택 ...
뉴스
제조업체 선택의 핵심 요소인 녹지가 있는 미니멀한 공간의 현대적인 공기 청정기.

신뢰할 수 있는 공기청정기 제조업체를 선택할 때 고려해야 할 5가지 핵심 요소는 무엇인가요?

올바른 공기청정기 제조업체를 선택하는 것은 깨끗하고 건강한 공기를 보장하는 데 필수적입니다. 이 가이드에서는 공기 정화 기술에 대한 전문성, 맞춤화 등 5가지 중요한 요소에 대해 설명합니다.
뉴스
HisoAir-HA1223-데스크탑-공기청정기

맞춤형 공기청정기를 제작하는 방법: OEM 서비스를 통한 컨셉부터 출시까지

오늘날의 경쟁이 치열한 공기 정화 시장에서 맞춤형 공기 청정기를 통해 브랜드는 고유 한 기능, 맞춤형 디자인 및 호소력있는 특정 기능으로 차별화 할 수 있습니다 ...
뉴스
치과 진료실의 공기질을 개선하는 iq 공기청정기

아이큐에어 공기청정기는 왜 그렇게 비싼가요?

많은 잠재적 구매자가 IQAir 공기청정기를 고려할 때 가격표에 당황하는 경우가 많습니다. 그러나 비용에는 다음과 같은 고유한 기능이 반영되어 있습니다.
뉴스
나란히 놓인 HEPA 필터와 카본 필터 클로즈업

헤파 필터와 탄소 필터: 어떤 것이 공기질을 더 개선할까요?

더 깨끗한 실내 공기를 찾으려면 HEPA 필터와 탄소 필터 중 하나를 선택하는 것이 중요합니다. HEPA 필터는 미세한 입자를 포집하는 능력으로 잘 알려져 있습니다.
뉴스
먼지를 줄여주는 거실용 공기 청정기

공기청정기는 먼지를 줄이는 데 얼마나 효과적일까요?

집에서 더 깨끗한 공기를 찾기 위해 탐색하다 보니 공기청정기에 대한 상반된 정보에 둘러싸여 있는 제 자신을 발견했습니다. 많은 사람들이 감소한다고 주장합니다 ...
뉴스
인증 라벨 및 규정 준수 체크리스트가 있는 공기청정기

공기청정기 제조업체가 미국 표준 및 인증을 준수하는지 어떻게 확인할 수 있나요?

복잡한 공기청정기 표준을 파악하는 것은 안전과 효과를 보장하는 데 매우 중요합니다. 공기청정기 제조업체가 미국 표준을 준수하는지 확인하려면 다음을 확인하세요.
뉴스
현대식 거실에 IoT 및 AI 기능을 갖춘 스마트 공기청정기

IoT와 AI가 공기청정기 기능을 어떻게 혁신할 수 있을까요?

공기 정화 환경은 중대한 변화를 앞두고 있습니다. IoT와 AI 기술을 통합함으로써 공기청정기는 더욱 스마트해지고 있으며, 실시간으로 ...
뉴스

공기청정기 생산을 주도하는 국가는 어디일까요? 중국과 인도?

전 세계적으로 공기질 문제에 대한 인식이 높아지면서 공기청정기에 대한 수요가 급증하고 있습니다. 이 기사에서는 중국 간의 경쟁 구도를 살펴봅니다 ...
뉴스
공장 환경의 생산 라인에 있는 공기 청정기

공기청정기 생산을 주도하는 국가는 어디일까요? 말레이시아 또는 중국?

공기질에 대한 우려가 높아지면서 공기청정기에 대한 수요도 증가하고 있습니다. 이 기사에서는 이러한 장치의 기원이 중요한지 여부에 초점을 맞춰 살펴봅니다.
뉴스
공기청정기와 소음 측정기를 갖춘 전문 테스트 룸

공기청정기의 소음 수준을 효과적으로 테스트하려면 어떻게 해야 하나요?

저와 같은 분이라면 휴식과 생산성을 위해 평화로운 환경이 필수적입니다. 공기청정기에 투자할 때 걱정했던 것은 ...
뉴스
공장을 배경으로 한 중국과 멕시코의 공기청정기 생산량 비교

공기청정기 생산을 주도하는 국가는 어디일까요? 중국 또는 멕시코?

전 세계적으로 공기질에 대한 우려가 높아지면서 공기청정기의 생산이 화제가 되고 있습니다. 중국은 현재 70% 이상의 점유율로 이 시장을 지배하고 있습니다 ...
뉴스
Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기