새 탭에서 열립니다
혁신적인 공기질 솔루션

뉴스

LG 공기청정기 (8)

LG 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

이 블로그 게시물은 대부분의 프리미엄 모델이 한국에서 생산되지만 비용 효율적인 옵션이 있다는 점을 강조하면서 LG 공기 청정기의 제조 원산지를 살펴 봅니다 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
삼성 공기청정기 (3)

삼성 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

삼성 공기청정기는 주로 중국, 특히 광둥성 포산시에서 생산됩니다. 이 선택은 비용 효율성과 접근성에 의해 주도됩니다 ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
바이폴라 이온화 공기청정기와 헤파 공기청정기의 비교

바이폴라 이온화 대 HEPA 공기청정기: 어느 쪽이 더 효과적일까요?

바이폴라 이온화 공기청정기와 HEPA 공기청정기 중에서 선택하기는 어려울 수 있습니다. HEPA 필터는 99.97%의 공기 중 입자를 포집하여 공기질을 개선하기 위한 신뢰할 수 있는 선택입니다.
2024-11-24
뉴스
공기청정기 3대를 갖춘 현대적인 인테리어의 객실입니다.

이오나이저 대 UV 대 HEPA 공기청정기: 어떤 것이 가장 적합할까요?

올바른 공기청정기를 선택하는 것은 혼란스러울 수 있습니다. HEPA 필터는 매우 효과적이며 알레르기 유발 물질, 먼지, 박테리아를 포함한 공기 중 입자를 99.97% 포집합니다. 반면, ...
2024-11-24
뉴스
상어 공기 청정기

상어 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

상어 공기 청정기는 주로 중국과 베트남에서 제조되며, 첨단 제조 기술과 숙련된 노동력을 활용하여 경쟁력 있는 가격으로 높은 품질을 보장합니다. 이 ...
2024-11-22
뉴스
코웨이 공기청정기 (3)

코웨이 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

공기청정기로 유명한 한국 브랜드인 코웨이는 주로 중국 광저우에서 제품을 생산하고 있습니다. 이러한 전략적 결정으로 코웨이는 중국의 ...
2024-11-22
뉴스
위닉스 공기청정기 (2)

위닉스 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

위닉스 공기청정기는 주로 한국에서 제조되며, 숙련된 인력과 첨단 기술이 높은 품질에 기여합니다. 이 회사의 장점은 ...
2024-11-22
뉴스
르보아 공기청정기 룸 사이즈 홈페이지

르보아 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

Levoit 공기청정기는 주로 중국, 특히 푸젠성, 광둥성, 저장성에서 생산됩니다. 이러한 전략적 제조 선택은 강력한 시장을 뒷받침합니다 ...
2024-11-22
뉴스
홈 커버 블루에어 공기청정기

블루에어 공기청정기는 어디에서 제조되나요?

블루에어 공기청정기는 주로 중국 포산에서 생산되며, 심천과 동관의 공급업체를 포함한 강력한 공급망을 활용하고 있습니다. 유니레버의 인수 이후, 블루에어는 ...
2024-11-22
뉴스
블루에어 알레르기

블루에어 공기청정기의 가격이 비싼 이유는 무엇인가요?

블루에어 공기청정기는 기계식 여과와 정전기 충전을 효율적으로 결합한 혁신적인 헤파사일런트 기술로 인해 높은 가격표로 유명합니다 ...
2024-11-22
뉴스
현대적인 가구와 식물 사이에 세련된 공기청정기가 돋보이는 모던한 거실.

실내 공기질 기준을 충족하기 위해 CARB 인증 공기청정기가 필수인 이유는 무엇인가요?

CARB 인증 공기청정기는 안전한 실내 공기질을 유지하는 데 필수적입니다. 캘리포니아 대기 자원 위원회에서 설정한 엄격한 배출 기준을 준수하며, 상당히 ...
2024-11-21
뉴스
천장

네일 살롱에 가장 적합한 공기청정기는 무엇인가요?

네일 살롱은 네일 제품의 먼지와 화학 연기로 인해 독특한 공기질 문제에 직면합니다. 표준 가정용 공기청정기는 종종 이러한 문제를 해결하기에 부족합니다.
2024-11-21
Air purifier, News
Contaminant Engineering•3 min read

PFAS Water Filtration Technologies Explained: Carbon, Resin & RO

Key Takeaway:

PFAS reduction depends on the specific compounds present, treatment media, contact time, water chemistry, and system design. Activated carbon, ion exchange, and Reverse Osmosis address PFAS through different mechanisms.

PFAS are a large family of persistent fluorinated compounds that can occur in drinking-water supplies. Their treatment behavior varies significantly by molecular structure, chain length, functional group, concentration, and the chemistry of the source water.

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) removes PFAS primarily through adsorption. It is generally more effective for many longer-chain PFAS, while shorter-chain compounds tend to break through more quickly. Carbon performance depends on media properties, Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT), competing organic matter, loading, and replacement frequency.

Ion-exchange resins use charged functional sites to capture many PFAS compounds. Properly selected anion-exchange media can provide high capacity and may perform better than conventional activated carbon for some shorter-chain PFAS, although performance still depends on water chemistry and competing ions.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) uses membrane separation rather than adsorption. Properly designed RO systems can provide broad reduction across many PFAS compounds as well as dissolved salts and other contaminants. Unlike carbon or resin, however, RO also produces a concentrate stream that must be managed.

No single technology should be selected from a PFAS label alone. System design should consider which PFAS compounds are present, their concentrations, required reduction targets, flow rate, media life, and the applicable third-party certification or validation requirements.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Product Discovery•3 min read

How to Choose an Under-Sink Water Purifier for Modern Kitchens

Key Takeaway:

Match the treatment technology to your water quality first, then evaluate cabinet space, faucet configuration, flow rate, drain and power requirements, and filter replacement needs.

Choosing an under-sink water purifier starts with water chemistry. Carbon filtration is well suited to chlorine, taste, odor, and many organic contaminants, while Reverse Osmosis is more appropriate when dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants need to be reduced.

For compact kitchens, tankless RO systems eliminate the conventional storage tank and can significantly reduce the space required under the sink. However, membrane capacity stated in GPD does not directly equal faucet flow. When comparing systems, check the actual dispensing flow rate, inlet-pressure requirement, recovery ratio, and whether a booster pump is required.

Installation architecture also matters. Many RO systems require a drain connection, electrical power, and either a dedicated drinking-water faucet or a compatible multi-function faucet. High-flow carbon systems can often connect directly to the existing cold-water line with a simpler installation, but pressure drop and available faucet flow should still be verified.

RO also removes much of the naturally occurring dissolved mineral content. Where taste or mineral balance is a priority, a post-RO remineralization stage can be added. Filter life should be evaluated by both rated capacity and local water quality rather than replacement time alone.

The right system is therefore not simply the smallest or highest-GPD model. It is the configuration that matches the target contaminants, available cabinet space, desired faucet setup, peak dispensing demand, and maintenance expectations.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Water Quality•2 min read

What Does TDS Mean in Drinking Water? Measurement vs Contaminant Reality

Key Takeaway:

A TDS meter estimates the overall concentration of dissolved ionic substances from electrical conductivity. It cannot identify specific contaminants or determine whether water is chemically safe.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) refers to the combined concentration of dissolved substances in water. Most handheld TDS meters do not measure TDS directly. Instead, they measure electrical conductivity (EC) and convert that reading into an estimated parts-per-million (ppm) value.

This means a TDS reading can indicate how much dissolved ionic material is present, but not what that material actually is. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, nitrates, and other dissolved ions can all contribute to conductivity, yet a simple TDS meter cannot distinguish between them.

TDS meters are also not suitable for detecting trace contaminants such as PFAS, many VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, or disinfection byproducts. These substances may be present at concentrations far below the level needed to noticeably change electrical conductivity.

A low TDS reading therefore does not guarantee safe drinking water, and a higher TDS reading does not automatically indicate contamination. Water-treatment decisions should be based on laboratory testing for specific contaminants of concern rather than TDS alone.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•2 min read

RO vs UF Water Filtration: Understanding Pore Sizes & Dissolved Minerals

Key Takeaway:

Ultrafiltration can reduce bacteria, turbidity, and suspended particles while retaining most naturally occurring dissolved minerals. Reverse Osmosis provides much broader reduction of dissolved salts and smaller contaminants.

Ultrafiltration (UF) typically uses hollow-fiber membranes with pore sizes in the approximate 0.01–0.1 micron range. These membranes physically retain turbidity, suspended solids, colloids, and many microorganisms while allowing dissolved minerals and salts to remain in the water.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) operates at a much finer separation level. Unlike UF, RO can substantially reduce dissolved ions such as sodium, calcium, fluoride, nitrates, and other contributors to total dissolved solids (TDS). This makes RO more suitable when dissolved-salt reduction is a primary treatment objective.

UF generally requires less system pressure and produces little or no continuous concentrate stream in many point-of-use configurations. RO typically requires greater pressure and produces a reject-water stream, but delivers broader contaminant reduction.

For water with acceptable TDS and mineral content, UF can be a simpler mineral-retaining treatment option. Where dissolved salts, fluoride, nitrates, or broader dissolved contaminants are a concern, RO is generally the more appropriate technology.

HisoAir Water Technical Series
Technology Selection•4 min read

Carbon Block vs Reverse Osmosis: Which Fits Your Need?

Key Takeaway:

Choose RO for dissolved inorganic salts and heavy metals; choose Carbon Block for chemical taste/odor, no wastewater, and high line-pressure flow.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Carbon Block filtration represent two fundamentally different treatment methods: membrane separation and adsorption. Understanding these differences helps determine which technology is better suited to a specific water-quality requirement.

Reverse Osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane with pore sizes of approximately 0.0001 microns. It can significantly reduce dissolved inorganic contaminants such as TDS, fluoride, nitrates, and certain heavy metals. Because water must be forced through the membrane, RO systems require sufficient pressure or a booster pump and generate a concentrated wastewater stream.

Carbon Block filtration relies primarily on adsorption through compressed activated carbon, commonly with nominal pore sizes around 0.5–5 microns. It is highly effective for chlorine, chloramines, VOCs, taste, and odor, while allowing substantially higher direct-flow rates without producing wastewater.

From an operating perspective, Carbon Block systems are generally simpler, require less energy, and avoid the water loss associated with RO. RO involves higher system complexity and operating cost, but provides substantially broader reduction of dissolved contaminants that Carbon Block alone cannot address.

HisoAir Water Technical Series

견적 요청하기